The World Economic Forum has come to a consensus with their prediction of what life will be like by the year 2030, and it could be dystopian

 

The World Economic Forum brought together a delegation of 800 experts and executives in technology. Their aim was to gather these expert’s consensus predictions for what life will be like in 2030. Some of their predictions are quite frightening – especially if the world doesn’t advance in a more ethical direction.

Already, the evolution of the Internet of Things (IoT) is snowballing on almost a daily basis. Many of the items we now purchase are somehow connectable to the internet. And the number of those items is increasing all the time exponentially. Other technologies are also advancing at a frightening rate.

 

 

 

Experts predict that the following items are some of the most radical ways our world will change by 2030:

1. Your screens will become obsolete

Most people are still amazed that tech companies have made virtual reality headsets readily available to the general public. However, at the rate technology has been advancing, the technology they use is actually now verging on obsolete. Additionally, the technology is wrought with problems, as many users complain of experiencing nausea and eye strain.

 

 

Lytro already sells a camera that solves the light field problem and solves the issue with eye strain and nausea. However, their technology really only captures images in the traditional way a camera does, albeit in a phenomenal way. Further than this, another company, Avegant have created a headset that enables the user to have a 4D experience.

They ultimately plan to make the headset as simple to wear as a pair of sunglasses. Engineers call the effects Light Field Technology. If you were to time travel to your future self in 2030, you would probably see yourself sitting in a plain room wearing a pair of these glasses and waving your hands and fingers around in some kind of virtual 4-dimensional world.

 

2. Frightening genetic engineering advances may cause humanity to rush to establish new ethical laws

One of the most disturbing “advances” that scientists have predicted for 2030 is in genetic engineering. For some time now, biochemists have been developing advanced genetic engineering. These scientists call their technique Continuous Regularly Interspersed Short Palindromic Repeats or CRISPR for short.  Essentially, these researchers have developed an allegedly cheap and reliable way to edit genes.

 

 

Immediately, however, one can imagine endless ethical dilemmas arise over the morality of CRISPR. Genetic engineers could begin playing around with animal breeding, whereby wild animals could be potentially engineered to be small and domesticated. However, history has proven time again that breeding animals is traumatic for the animal kingdom. As a prime example, breeders have devastatingly damaged and deformed the British Bulldog during their selfish quest for aesthetic.

Additionally, the opportunity for crime and the criminals committing crimes to be detected would increase exponentially. Criminals could visit a rogue underground lab and assume an entirely new identity. Frighteningly, these examples of supposed scientific advances seem to make 2030 potentially appear as a dystopian nightmare.

 

3. Biofacturing to take over manufacturing

Humans do not actually have any firm knowledge of where life comes from, or what it even means. However, this hasn’t stopped the human race from playing around with biological agents. Playing around with the unpredictable fire of life simply to suit the desires of our supposed superior species.

Many biotechnologists do seek to find ways to use biofacturing for good purposes. Many see biofacturing as a way to avoid harsh pesticides, for example. They percieve it to be a more natural ways to protect crops. Additionally, scientists are attempting to find ways to create meat from animal cell cultures, in order to ultimately make the animal farming industry obsolete. However, environmentalists and animal activists can point out numerous ethical dilemmas from both of these supposed “advances.”

 

 

Keep reading…